Archive

Archive for the ‘NY LAW’ Category

How I Learned to Twitter in 7 Weeks

March 24th, 2009
Adrian Dayton asked:


I stumbled onto Twitter as a marketing tool completely by accident. I was looking for a way to promote a book I’m working on, and a friend suggested that I do two things: Start a blog and get on Twitter.

“What is Twitter? I don’t get how will it help me promote my book to tell people what I am having for breakfast,” I replied. “It would take me too long to explain, just try it out,” he said.

What follows here is a week-by-week review of how I learned that Twitter can be an important business-development tool for lawyers and law firms.

Week 1: Signing up The sign-up at Twitter. com was just like everything else. I needed to add a picture but luckily, I was still holding on to the picture used for my attorney bio, so I uploaded that. A bio. Usually I leave them blank, but this one was limited to 150 characters, so I wrote: “Father, husband, attorney, and aspiring author. Follow me as I work to get published.” I was pretty happy with myself, it was a perfect bio for someone trying to get published. After I finished my profile, Twitter suggested that I start following a bunch of famous people like Ashton Kutcher and Shaquille O’Neal. Was it the real Shaq? Turns out it was. These famous people have almost 80,000 people following them, and the truth is I just didn’t get it.

Week 2: I start following people I needed help finding some publishers to submit my manuscript to, so I used the Twitter search function. I searched using the term “publisher” and turned up about 50 results. So I started following all 50 of them. Some were small publishers, some were big, but the cool part was that they were all posting stories and links all about writing and publishing, one of the articles was “10 Things Every Author Should Do Before Submitting a Manuscript.” This was good stuff, exactly the types of things I needed to learn in my situation. I also realized that, as I started following people, the majority of them followed me back. Now I had more than 30 followers. I was feeling pretty good.

Week 3: A fortuitous connection Some total stranger was asking about my book, this was great. So I explained my book to him, and we chatted back and forth using Twitter’s Direct Messages, which are kind of like an e-mail message or private messages on Facebook. He was an author who has self-published in the past, and he gave me the phone number of one of the gurus of self-publishing. Out of the blue, I call this guy up, and he takes an hour and talks to me. He gives me advice and shares a few contacts with me.

Week 4: Spreading the message When someone shares an interesting link to an article on Twitter or shares a good quote, it gets repeated. This is called a “retweet.” I noticed that whenever I posted articles, they never got retweeted. Why not? Because they weren’t interesting enough. So I started paying attention to the types of articles that were retweeted. Usually they announced breaking news or shared really interesting content on blogs, so I started trying to think of something to post on my blog that might garner some interest. I posted a satirical response to an article one of my buddies from law school posted, and it spread like wildfire, or at least like a small brush fire. I had 170 unique visitors to my blog in just an hour or two in response to that one post. That was fun but, more importantly, it made me realize the power of Twitter. Here I was with fewer than 100 followers, and my message spread well beyond that circle.

Week 5: My first corporate client “Does anybody know an attorney that practices contract law?” “Yeah, that’s actually what I do, what do you need?” I replied suspiciously. “My friend needs some legal advice about a contract, could you talk to her?” “Sure, send me a direct message with her contact into.” After exchanging e-mail addresses and a few phone conversations, my firm had a new client. All our communication was exchanged over the phone and e-mail, and the retainer and payment were paid by credit card. It was so easy, it made me realize that maybe there was more to Twitter than just promoting books. Maybe I could use Twitter to find clients. You see, Twitter functions like a giant cocktail party where thousands of conversations are going on simultaneously. You can listen in on any conversation you please, you just simply need to “follow” the individuals having the conversation. Unlike two other social networking sites, Facebook and Myspace,you don’t need to be accepted as someone’s “friend” to listen in on their conversation. For example, if MC Hammer and Vanilla Ice (both of whom are on Twitter) are having a Twitter conversation, then you may listen in if you have a Twitter account- you can even try to add your own clever enough comment or question to be included in their discussion.

Week 6: Automated searches Using the free program Tweetdeck, I set up searches so that every time someone mentioned “contract law” on Twitter, from anywhere in the world, their post was filtered through a search that arrived instantly on my computer. I soon learned how to create an alert that would send me an e-mail or text message any time the term “contract law” was mentioned in a Twitter post. That allowed me to respond in real time. Return for a second to our cocktail-party analogy. Here you are at this gigantic cocktail party, and you overhear a conversation about contract law. “Excuse me, I couldn’t help but overhear you are looking for a corporate attorney. Could I recommend someone? And like that, a new relationship is created that is specifically targeted. Here are a few of the comments I saw posted on Twitter after setting up my search: “I urgently need an immigration attorney, can anybody recommend one?” “My friend is getting a divorce, can anybody recommend an attorney?” “Does anybody know a NY attorney I can ask a malpractice question to?”

Week 7 and beyond: A world of opportunity I have been on Twitter for 14 weeks. I have a large following now, but more importantly, I have learned some amazing tools that are helping me to expand my zone of influence beyond just Western New York. Every day I see potential leads- some of which I pass on or have to ignore because they are outside of my area of expertise. There are some 12 million users of Twitter now, mostly highly educated people in urban centers, and they are talking about every single legal topic imaginable. My recommendation for any lawyer? You just need to jump in and give it a try.



Raymond

NY LAW , ,

Medical Malpractice New Jersey Insurance Rates & C-sections In-line

March 22nd, 2009
Paul Justice asked:


Medical malpractice may occur more often then you might expect due to the amount errors that have occurred during the past years. Whether it’s because of the lack of qualified doctors, by mere accident, or by a contrived notion the rate of medical malpractice is increasing. Studies have also showed that as the number of Caesarian sections the rate of medical malpractice also has increased. This relation of C-Sections to medical malpractice rates is foreseeable because endure a C-section instead of a vaginal birth is more risky on the mother but less risky on the baby. “When I compared the malpractice rates to cesarean delivery rates prior to 1999, both were declining at a similar rate,” says Dr. Jeffrey Spencer. From 1999 to 2005, however, both were increasing. “I can’t say one led to the other or visa versa,” he says, but he speculates that rising medical malpractice rates are driving up cesarean delivery rates. Medical malpractice insurance rates have been a hot topic for recently then trend of large gaps in increasing rates have been frozen. Bloomberg froze medical malpractice insurance rates because doctors in the New Jersey and New York area were threatening to leave if something was not done.

On the other hand, because the medical malpractice New Jersey rate has been increasing insurance companies have been forking over large settlements to the victims of the medical malpractice New Jersey cases. It is a headed thorn because doctors are unable to pay the hefty insurance rates and the insurance companies cannot afford the large settlements. You would think that the simple answer would be for doctors to just stop committing medical malpractice and everything would settle down. Ending medical malpractice in New Jersey is optimal but in all reality it is something that would take many years to actually occur. The problem is that doctors are being pressured by pharmaceutical companies to sell their expensive drugs to patients that might not even need the drug. The prescriptions of these drugs could even end harming patients if they are being prescribed medication that they don’t need. The pressure from the pharmaceutical companies on the doctors is tremendous, for doctors need to find that extra income to keep up with their medical malpractice New Jersey Insurance. But now that the rates are being frozen, they have no excuse to comply with the pharmaceutical companies ploys.

If you or a loved one has been victim to medical malpractice in New Jersey, contact a lawyer as soon as possible. Medical malpractice cases carry strong time limitations that could possible deny you the ability to file a medical malpractice New Jersey case. It is imperative that you contact another doctor for a second opinion if you think that you have fallen victim to medical malpractice. A medical malpractice New Jersey lawyer has the skills needed to stand up for you in a court of law. It is in your best interest to contact a medical malpractice lawyer as soon as possible for they may be able to gain back compensation that was taken from you.



Clarence

NY LAW , ,

List of All Uscis (formerly Ins) Offices Nationwide

March 18th, 2009
Manu Geol asked:


US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is a part of the Department of Homeland Security, and performs some of the functions formerly carried out by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), which was part of the Department of Justice. USCIS was created on March 1, 2003 from what was formerly the Immigration Services Division (ISD) of the INS, which is now abolished.

USCIS does processing of immigrant visa petitions, naturalization petitions and asylum and refugee applications. It also issues employment authorization documents (EAD) and grants lawful permanent resident status (green card), and citizenship to foreigners. It was created by the government to process applications more efficiently and effectively. Besides, improvement efforts have included reducing the backlog of applications, as well as providing customer service through different channels.

Following is the list of 83 USCIS District Offices and Sub-offices nationwide.

Agana, GU; Albany, NY; Albuquerque, NM; Anchorage, AK; Atlanta, GA; Baltimore, MD; Boise, ID; Boston, MA; Buffalo, NY; Casper, WY; Charleston, SC; Charleston,WV; Charlotte Amalie Charlotte, NC; Cherry Hill, NJ; Chicago, IL; Christiansted, VI; Chula Vista, CA; Cincinnati, OH; Cleveland, OH; Columbus, OH; Dallas, TX; Denver, CO; Des Moines, IA; Detroit, MI; Dover, DE; El Paso, TX; Fort Smith, AR; Fresno, CA; Greer, SC; Harlington, TX; Hartford, CN Helena, MT Honolulu, HW Houston, TX; Indianapolis, IN Jacksonville, FL Kansas City, MO Las Vegas, NV Los Angeles, CA; Louisville, KY Manchester, NH Memphis, TN Miami, FL Milwaukee, WI

New Orleans, LO New York City, NY Newark, NJ Norfolk, VA Oklahoma City, OK; Omaha, NE; Orlando, FL Philadelphia, PA Phoenix, AZ Pittsburgh, PA; Portland, ME Portland, OR; Providence, RI Reno, NV Rochester, NY; Sacramento, CA Saint Albans, VT Saint Louis, MO Saint Paul, MN Salt Lake City, UT; San Antonio, TX San Bernardino, CA San Diego, CA San Francisco, CA San Jose, CA; San Juan, PR Santa Ana, CA Seattle, WA Spokane, WA Syracuse, NY; Tampa, FL Tucson, AZ Washington, DC West Palm Beach, FL; Witchita, KS and Yakima, WA.



Paul

NY LAW , ,

How Liberty Reserve Works

February 15th, 2009
Vundaber asked:


THIS YEAR IS YOUR YEAR

PROVEN BY OPRAH SHOW, MAKING MONEY USING libertyreserve¡*

PROVEN BY OPRAH SHOW¡*MAKE EASY MONEY USING libertyreserve¡*

PROVEN BY OPRAH SHOW, MAKING MONEY USING libertyreserve¡*

SPEND $5 AND MAKE THOUSANDS¡*

Liberty Reserve

Proven to work by OPRAH DATE LNIE & 20/20!

There are thousands of peoples out there, regular people, like you and me, searching for a way to make money legally and easy, will here is a way you can do that. Please give this letter a chance, everything on it is true and it can help you get that kind of money you dreamed of. And you are only investing $5.00!!!

When I read this I thought I figured at least 6 people would respond out of the millions of people that use the internet. And wow!! In 4 days I made my $5 back and my libertyreserve account is growing even while I sleep. You should give it a try too! You have nothing to lose, and thousands to gain! You have most likely seen or heard about this projection on TV programs such as 20/20 and Oprah or you may have read about it in the Wall Street Journal. If not, here it is below-revealed to you in step-by-step detail. This program is by no existence in many forms for at least a decade. But in the early days, it required a lot more time and effort, as well as an investment of a few hundred dollars. However thanks to libertyreserve and the internet, the investment is now virtually ZERO! And what¡¯s more, the entire process is FASTER, EASIER, and MORE LUCRATIVE than it has EVER been! This is the email sent to me:

Make $5, 00 with just $5 in 30 days with libertyreserve

I WAS SHOCKED WHEN I SAW HOW MUCH MONEY CAME FLOODING INTO MY LIBERTYRESERVE ACCOUNT I turned $5 into $5,706 within the first 30 days of operating the business plan that I am about to reveal to you free of charge. If you decide to take action on the following instructions, I will GURANTEE that you will enjoy a similar return! The only things you will need are:

- An email address.

-a libertyreserve account with at least $5 deposited in it. (It¡¯s free to sign up to libertyreserve.com

- And just 15 to 30 minutes of your time. (The more time you put into it, the more time you¡¯ll see in return) this program takes just half an hour to set up. After that, there is absolutely no work whatsoever to do on your part. You have absolutely NOTHING to lose, and there is NO LIMIT to the amount of income you can generate from this one single business program. Let¡¯s get started, just follow the instructions exactly as set out below and then get prepared for a HUGE influx of cash over the next 30 days! Here¡¯s what you need to do¡*

REQUIRMENTS:

#1) an email address

#2) libertyreserve account (free to open at: Liberty Reserve

#3) $5

Now follow the steps: 1-4 STEP #1 ¨C Setting up your FREE e-gold (if you already have an account, just move on to the next step) it¡¯s extremely safe and very easy to set up a FREE e-gold account or libertyreserve copy and paste this to the address bar Liberty Reserve

libertyreserve.com is used by thousands of companies, including eBay to accept credit cards and other forms of payment¡*

STEP #2: Fund your libertyreserve account locally from listed exchangers. STEP #3: Sending libertyreserve money “it is an undeniable law of the universe that we must first give in order to receive.” Now all you have to do is send $1.00 by way of libertyreserve to each of the five email address listed below. After setting up your free libertyreserve account, confirming or verifying is AND putting (five dollars) #5.00 into your libertyreserve Account use the Account tab on libertyreserve to send $1.00 to each of the numbers on the list. Then remove the top one (#1) and place your libertyreserve number in the #5 spot in the list of numbers # 1- #5 . Remember your number becomes #5.

*** Make sure the subject of the payment says¡* *PLEASE PUT ME ON YOUR EMAIL LIST* ***

(This keeps the program 100% legal¡* so please don¡¯t forge!) The following are the e-gold numbers:

#!) U2743930 

#2) u2486619

#3) U3707907

#4) u5137767

#5) U0692622

Remember, all of this is ABSOLUTELT LEGAL! You are creating a service! A business¡* An Email List Service Business. If you have any doubts, please refer to title 18 Sec. 1302 & 1241 of the United States Postal Laws. However, do not spam. This means, you should never sent it to an email that was not given to you willingly by the owner. This makes your business completely legal.

STEP#3 ¨C Adding your libertyreserve number:

After you send your five $1.00 payments, it¡¯s your turn to add your libertyreserve number to the list! Take the #1) num libertyreserve ber off the list that you see above, move the other libertyreserve numbers up one by one (5 becomes 4 & 4 becomes 3, etc) then put YOUR e-gold number (the one used in your libertyreserve account as #5) on the list.

**MAKE SURE THE LIBERTYRESERVE YOU SUPPLY IS EXACTLY AS IT APPEARS IN YOUR LIBERTYRESERVE ACCOUNT **

STEP #4 ¨C Copy Message to 200 Newsgroups, message boards, etc¡*¡* or you can start sending his letter to as many e-mails you encounter. The pure joy of receiving LIBERTYRESERVE Money! You are now ready to post your copy of this message, to at least 200 newsgroups, message boards, etc. (I think there are close to 32,000 groups). All you need is 200, but remember, the more you post, the more money you make-as well as everyone else on the list! In this situation your job is to let as many people see this letter as possible. So they will make you rich!!! HOW TO POST TO NEWSGROUPS & MESSAGE BOARDS

Step #1) you do not need to re-type this entire letter to do your own posting. Simply put your CURSOR at the beginning of this letter and drag your CURSOR to the bottom of this document, and select “copy” from the edit menu. This will copy the entire letter into your computer¡¯s temporary memory.

Step #2) Open a blank “Notepad” fie and place your cursor at the blank page. From the “Edit” menu select “Paste”. This will paste a copy of the letter into notepad so that you can add your email to the list. Or copy to a word document and place in the e-nail.

Step #3) Save your new Work or Notepad file as a txt file. If you want to do your postings in different sittings, you¡¯ll always have this file to go back to.

Step #4) Use Netscape or internet Explorer and try searching for various newsgroups. On-line forums, message boards, bulletin boards, char sites, discussions, discussion groups, online communities, etc. EXAMPLE: go to any search engine like yohoo.com, Google.com, altavista.com, excit..com-then search with subjects like millionaire message board or money making message board or opportunity message board or money making discussions or business bulletin board or money making forum etc. you will find thousands & thousands of message boards. Click the, one by one then you will find the option to post a new message.

Step #5) Visit these message board and post this article as a new message by highlighting the text of this letter and selecting ¡®select All¡¯ the go the message board and ¡®paste¡¯ from the ¡®Edit¡¯ menu. Fill in the Subject, this will be the header that everyone sees as they scroll thru the list f postings in a particular group, click the post message bulletin. You¡¯re done with your first one! Congratulations! THAT”S IT!! ALL you have to do is ump to different newsgroups and post away. After you get the hang of it, it will take about 30 seconds for each newsgroup!

REMEMBER, THE MORE NEWSGROUPS AND/OR MESSAGE BOARDS YOU POST IN, THE MORE MONEY YOU WILL MAKE!! BUT YOU HAVE TO TRU TO POST A MINIMUM OF 200**.

That¡¯s it! You will begin receiving money within days! Explanation of why it works so well.

The things to remember are thousands of people all over the world are joining the internet and reading these articles everyday, JUST LIKE YOU are now! So can you afford $5.00?? And see if it really works?? I think so! People have said what if the plan is played out and no one sends you the money? So what are the chances of that happening when there are tons of new honest users and new honest people who are joining the internet and newsgroups everyday and are willing to give it a try? Estimates are at 20,000 to 50,000 new users everyday, with thousands of those having the actual internet. Remember, pay FAIRLY and HONESTLY and this will work. This really isn¡¯t another one of those crazy scams! As long as people FOLLOW THROUGH with sending out $5.00, it works! Thank you for reading this letter. Now give yourself the opportunity to try it out, there is really nothing to lose. With warm wishes, bless you and your loves ones¡*

$$$$$ REMEMBER, IT IS 100% LEGAL! DON¡¯T PASS THIS UP STILL NEED PROOF? Here are just 3 testimonials from the countless individuals who decided to invest nothing more than $5 and half an hour of their time to participate in this program¡*

“what an amazing plan! I followed your instructions just 3 weeks ago, and although I haven¡¯t made 5 grand yet, I¡¯m already up to $4,135. I¡¯m absolutely gob

Smacked.” ¨C Pam Wittemore, Ohio “well, what can I say¡*? THANK you so much! I SENT 40 E-MAIL OUT LIKE YOU SAID AND THEN I JUST FORGOT ABOOUT the whole thing. To be honest, I didn¡¯t really think anything would come of i. But when I checked my LIBERTYRESERVE account a week later, there was over #3,000 in my LIBERTYRESERVE account. After 30 days I now have over #5,000 to spend! I can¡¯t thank you enough!” ¨C Juan Tovar, NY , NY . “I was shocked when i saw how much money came flooding into my e-gold account. Within 3 weeks my account balance.



Frank

NY LAW , ,

The U.s. Terror War as Seen Through the Eyes of a Prisoner Khalid Awan Canadian Pakistani

February 12th, 2009
Arifmuhammad asked:


we first began corresponding with Khalid Awan in 2007, we had no idea why he was serving time in U.S. federal prison. We soon discovered Awan was one of the first of thousands of Muslims taken prisoner in the post-9/11 U.S. “terror war.” As the story began unfolding in our letters, we began to realize that this honest, humble and sincere man was not only innocent, but the ongoing injustice being done to him provides critical insight into the mindless, meanspirited, bureaucratic-yes-men idiocy fueling the illegal U.S. “war on terror” (and just about everything else that is going wrong in this country). At our insistence, Awan wrote his story and supplied us with whatever documents we requested. And now, after three months of cooperative efforts, the story of Khalid Awan can be told. We have come to know Awan as a peaceful man engaged in peaceful work who has been wrongfully accused, detained and repeatedly convicted of crimes he did not commit because he was a Muslim with international connections and an office in New York on 9/11. We present this to you in faith that you will realize a deeper understanding of the levels of complicity necessary for the “land of the free” to tolerate the phony war on terror year after year and in hope that Awan—and all the other million or more political prisoners being held by this country—will one day be reunited with their families.By Khalid Awan

My name is Khalid Qayyam Awan. My rights have been eroded in the name of “national security.” Since I am a Muslim, my story has been written, produced, directed, choreographed and staged by U.S. government officials.The Department of Justice and the FBI have been under pressure by the Bush administration to find “terrorists” in this country and to preemptively convict them before they can strike at the U.S. Although there is good evidence that there are few, if any, potential terrorists in the Muslim communities of the United States, U.S. attorneys who are not able to find any real “terrorists,” target, prosecute and convict innocent Muslims on phony or inflated criminal charges to show they are politically “loyal to the president,” and to avoid being fired for political reasons, as recent news revelations strongly suggest. These prosecutions have destroyed families in a country that is renowned for its human rights activities around the world.

BackgroundI am a 46-year old Canadian citizen and native of Pakistan. Throughout my life I studied in Catholic Christian schools and read the Bible every morning. I received my Masters Degree in Political Science at the University of Karachi in Pakistan and I am one of the founding members of the Pakistan Human Rights Commission. As a result of my belief in humanity and equality, I moved to Canada in 1993, becoming a Canadian citizen in 1996. In Canada I worked as an immigration consultant and was a member of the Canadian Bar Association. As part of my business, I also had an office in New York, which is where I was on Sept 11, 2001.

October 2001On October 25, 2001, U.S. government agents entered my house in Garden City, NY, without knocking and yelled at me to drop everything or they would shoot me. They forced me to lie on the ground while they handcuffed me and placed me under arrest.They claimed they had received an anonymous tip that I was a material witness for the 9/11 World Trade Center terrorist attack. After my arrest, I was taken in front of New York Judge Michael Mukasey (current U.S. attorney general known for his Israeli sympathies). After a detailed investigation by the FBI and U.S. Naval Intelligence, I was put in front of a Grand Jury. The case was dismissed on November 6, 2001.

Charge #2

 

Before I was released from custody, on November 5, 2001, the U.S. government imposed new charges: “Conspiracy to Commit Fraud and Money Laundering.” They alleged that I stole/misused the identity profiles of my clients, people who come to me seeking to obtain Canadian visas and citizenship in the U.S., although there was not a single complaint from any of my clients or any banks.(Note: Journalist Dr. Paul Craig Roberts stated in his 12/11/06 column, America’s Injustice System is Criminal: “The criminal justice system today consists of a process whereby a defendant is coerced into admitting to a crime in order to escape more severe punishment for maintaining his innocence. Many of the crimes for which people are imprisoned never occurred“).

Every defense attorney knows that today prosecutors can purchase testimony against a defendant by paying “witnesses” with money, dropping charges against them or reducing prison sentences to testify against defendants. Jurors tend to trust government prosecutors and are generally unaware that they will withhold exculpatory evidence and suborn perjury and bear false witness to obtain convictions.

Months went by. Then a year had passed and I was still “detained” without a trial for crimes I did not commit. My lawyer advised me to plead guilty. He said it was in my own best interests as I would be “facing 10 years on the money laundering charge” due to the current climate in New York courts and my being a Muslim and a native of Pakistan. By this time I had served 17 months in detention, so I pled guilty to $95,000 of fraud conspiracy, which carried a maximum sentence of 15 to 24 months. The plea agreement—release for time served—was not even honored and I was sentenced to five years, the sentence for approximately $2,400,000 in credit card fraud.

 

Appeal to CanadaIn January, 2005, when I was finally able to apply for a “treaty transfer” to Canada. I learned from my case manager that my citizenship was listed in the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ (BOP) computer as “Pakistani” instead of “Canadian.” All my Canadian documentation—passport, citizenship card, social insurance and health cards and Canadian drivers license—were in the possession of the FBI. I wrote the Canadian Consulate in Buffalo, NY, to request that they fix this problem so I could be transferred back to Canada. On March 30, 2005, the Canadian Consulate sent a letter to the jail to correct my citizenship status, but the FBOP ignored the request and did not correct the computer.I realize now that the BOP intentionally left my citizenship as “Pakistani” to make me administratively ineligible for transfer to Canada and keep me in the U.S. while the U.S. government prepared new charges against me.

A year later, six weeks before my scheduled release date, I was transferred from Allenwood FCI to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn, NY, supposedly in preparation for my deportation back to Canada. I signed the immigration deportation papers, which incidentally, contained my correct citizenship status. Later I learned the Allenwood FCI warden had been given a summons from Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) Lawrence Ferazani in January, 2006, requesting for me to appear in federal court in Brooklyn, NY, on February 15, 2006.

 

Family threatenedOnce in Brooklyn, on January 31, 2006, I phoned my family in Montreal. I learned that Officer Buttazzoni from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) had contacted my sister regarding the whereabouts of my wife. He was told that she had returned to Pakistan. Buttazzoni left his phone number with my brother-in-law, telling him to please tell my wife to call him back immediately. She called Buttazzoni several times and left messages on his voice mail, after which Buttazzoni told my brother-in-law to tell her not to call him again.Then on February 17, 2006, I was brought by AUSA Ferazani to an office in New York to be interrogated by the FBI without an attorney present. I was told by AUSA Farazani that if I did not talk they would arrest my sisters in Montreal and my wife, who had returned to Pakistan. He said, “We just have to make a call.”

I was surprised and scared that he knew where my family lived. He stated, “If you don’t tell me [what I want to know] I can recommend lethal injection to the court and call the press and tomorrow morning you will be in every newspaper as a big terrorist.”

Another federal agent told me that if I did not cooperate, they would turn me over to the Indian government, an enemy of Pakistan, which would treat me as an enemy.

At this time I was certain that my family was in danger because they were living in countries that work closely with U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies. After seeing my liberty evaporate when I was cleared of being a material witness in the World Trade Center tragedy, I had every reason to believe that the overarching power of the government would secure my family members’ arrests and inflict severe punishment on them. I strongly believed the RCMP was working in collaboration with the FBI to harass me to admit to charges of crimes that I did not commit. I thought about how the RCMP officials had played a role in other discrimination cases that included the interrogation and torture of Canadian citizens Mahrar Arar, Abdullah Almalki and Ahmed EI Matti, whose only “crimes” were being Canadian Muslims.

Because I felt I had no other choice, I signed the Miranda Rights waiver forms the agent gave me, waiving my right to an attorney’s presence during questioning and spoke with agents of the U.S. government on Feb. 17 and 20, 2006.

 

February 17, 2006: Interrogation…and bribeI was pushed to the edge during this interrogation. Even though I could not answer all of their questions, I was determined to provide anything they wanted, even if the questions made no sense. I tried to give answers so they would be pleased and not give me the death penalty or harm my family.During this interrogation, the agents offered me the opportunity to work for them in an “under cover capacity” abroad in Pakistan and Canada. They wanted me to testify against a group of Sikh people, on fabricated statements, based on my association with them from when I lived in Pakistan. I refused. So they told me to keep in mind that they wanted me to testify against people who are of the Sikh religion from India, an enemy of Pakistan and, because I am a Muslim, I should not have any concern for them.

I said, “But they are human beings! If they did something wrong and I knew about it, I would be more than happy to help the law, but you are asking me about something which I know nothing about.”

The agents waited a couple weeks and then started asking me again, this time through my attorney. Upon my continued refusal, Officer Buttazzoni in Montreal again approached my family. I told them to get an attorney and not to go to his office without a legal written notice from him. They followed my advice and the RCMP stopped calling them—but not before the FBI was able to create a self-incriminating statement based on “evidence” they secured during their interrogation of me without the presence of my attorney. As a result of this, prosecutors were able to go in front of a Grand Jury and indict me, based on my own (fabricated) statements, prepared by federal agents without my signature.

 

Third charge March 16, 2006On March 15, 2006, I completed the term of my imprisonment and was to be deported back to Canada. Before I could even go out onto the street I was arrested a third time and charged with “Providing Material Support to a Foreign Terrorist,” and “Money Laundering to Support Terrorism,” for supposedly providing support to the Sikh organization Khalistan Commando Force (KCF), through a man of the Sikh religion, Mr. Paramjit Singh Panjwar (PMJ), whom I met once when visiting Pakistan.These charges emerged while I was still in prison and had no capability to provide KCF with any kind of support. It was difficult for me to get enough finances together to pay my legal fees while I was in prison for five years and I could not launder any money because I did not have any. In the plea agreement I signed for my previous “money laundering” charge, it is mentioned that no further money laundering charges would be brought against me, so this was double jeopardy and a violation of the 5th Amendment of the Constitution.

August to December, 2006: administrative detention

 

I appeared in court and pled “not-guilty” for my second “superseding indictment” on August 2, 2006. Upon my unwavering refusal to work for the government on their fabricated statements against the Sikh people, FBOP officials placed me into the Segregation Housing Unit (SHU), for 210 days of segregation and isolation despite the fact that I was rated as needing low security on the government’s “Male Custody Classification Form.”Segregation was continuous torture as we were not given basic amenities or respect and the building was cold and leaky. I went on a hunger strike for four days and after that I filed various complaints with the FBOP higher authorities, but no action was taken.

October 2006After my refusal to work for the government on their case against “two individuals” they had identified as “potentially to be joined in this matter, but at this stage we don’t have enough evidence to charge,” the government went to them and indicted them and, giving them a lot of benefits, prepared them to testify against me.During my pre-trial hearing, the first two counts of my indictment were dismissed due to lack of facts and figures. Within two weeks, AUSA indicted me again, probably to cover up for their huge embarrassment. This hastily drawn up indictment was also full of factual errors and creative legal theories.

This time, in the bill of particulars/indictment, AUSA Farazani included the names of the following participants as co-conspirators in this “conspiracy.”

1) Khalid Awan—me2) Paramjit Singh Panjwar—Leader of Sikh Khalisto Commando Force (KFC), residing in Pakistan (not indicted).

3) Gurbax Singh—Indicted as co-conspirator #14) Baljinder Singh—Indicted as co-conspirator #2

5) Jatinder Singh—Residing in Texas (not indicted). 6) Dr. Pritpal Singh—Residing in California (not indicted).Except for me, all the “co-conspirators” are elected leaders of the Sikh religion, a group of people known in Pakistani history books as the worst killers and rapists of the Pakistani nation, having killed, raped, burned and cut into pieces a hundred thousand Pakistani Muslim men, women, girls and infants during the world’s largest migration from India to Pakistan in 1947.

 

Sikh Background (a little history)To better understand the game the U.S. government was playing with me and the Sikh people, a brief history is necessary. The mid-1980s to the mid-1990s was a decade of violent political opposition in Punjab, an area divided between India and Pakistan. The pattern of unlawful and indiscriminate arrests and killings during that time has left a lasting legacy of “catch and kill” police practices in the state. In the early 1980s, the Indian army attacked the Sikh Holy place called the Golden Temple in the Punjab State of India. About 10,000 civilian lives were lost while hundreds of people were detained without charge or trial and thousands of “disappearances” and extrajudicial executions were carried out by the police.As a result, thousands of Sikhs fled to various countries for asylum. Many of the Sikhs who were living near Pakistan took refuge inside Pakistan, having the advantage of speaking the same language and the area being home to established holy places where Sikhs from all over the world came annually to perform their pilgrimage to the Pakistan side of the Punjab state. Pakistan is like a Vatican for the Sikhs, because the Sikh religion was started there and is the birthplace of their holy guru.

Paramjit Singh Panjwar (PMJ)

 

Among these Sikhs, PMJ also took refuge after members of his family were arrested and killed by the Indian police. In Pakistan he started producing videos about the attacks and killings of Sikhs by the Indian police, and started printing and distributing literature on the Sikh problems at the hand of the Indian government. He also started broadcasting a daily radio program and running various charities for Sikh families in India and Pakistan whose bread-winning family members had been killed by the Indian government.I met PMJ during a visit to Pakistan when he was living next to my brother-in-law and I invited him to a wedding. He wrote his phone number down for me on a piece of paper. He also wrote down the number for Baljinder Singh, his friend in New York, because he was a community advocate for the Sikh people who might refer clients to me for immigration purposes. I kept the number, but did not call him.

The FBI had been after Baljinder Singh ever since he delivered a speech in front of the White House at the “Sikh Million March” on Washington in 2000. The FBI had called him for interrogation from 2000 to 2006, but was unable to arrest him. When they interrogated me on February 17, 2006, they told me they needed me to testify in court that the Pakistani government was taking care of terrorists in Pakistan and New York. It was Baljinder Singh, and Gurbax Singh, a close relative of PMJ, that they wanted me to testify against, and since they found his and PMJ’s phone numbers during their search of my office in New York after my arrest in 2001, they deputized their paid Sikh informant, Harjeet Singh, into my unit at MDC in 2006.

Harjeet told me he would be released from federal custody in the next six months and he wished to visit Pakistan for the annual Sikh pilgrimage there. He asked me if I knew some Sikhs in Pakistan who might take care of him during his visit. I replied that I did know Paramjit Singh Panjwar, who was there on asylum and introduced them over the phone.

The FBI then went to Baljinder and Gurbax Singh and convinced them to testify that I had transferred $4000 (two $2,000 transactions allegedly conducted between 1998 and 2002) from them to Pakistan on behalf of PMJ. In exchange for this, they dropped the charges they had against them and promised amnesty from the Indian government (for armed attack on Indian police) and U.S. green cards for them and their families.

PMJ has not been indicted by the U.S. nor convicted by the Indian courts of anything. No effort has been spent for his extradition by U.S. “terror war” ally, Pakistan, though the Pakistani government has, according to AI, handed over 700 Muslim citizens to the U.S. government.

According to my attorneys, no American citizen of the Christian faith nor of the Sikh faith has ever been arrested for providing material support to the KCF, even though the KCF is a Sikh organization that draws its support from members of the Sikh community.

I, on the other hand, a Canadian citizen of Pakistan origin and Muslim faith, on Sept 12, 2007, am the only person in the U.S. to be convicted of terrorism, on fake, fabricated and government purchased testimonies of the Sikh’s religious people, for transferring $4000. I was convicted and sentenced on three counts:

1) Conspiracy to provide material support (14 years)2) Providing material support to foreign terrorists (10 years)

3) Money laundering to support terrorism (14 years)Total: 38 years to run concurrently (14 more years in prison).

 

JailThe government sent me to FCI Terre Haute Prison in Indiana, a “medium” prison with the exception of one isolated unit, called the “Guantanamo Bay on American Soil,”—Unit D, the “dog unit.”According to the history of this jail, this unit was built in the 1930s for Cuban people, after which it was used for convicted members of the Ku Klux Klan. Then it was used for death row inmates until its “permanent closure.” It was re-opened with minor repairs for Muslim inmates because they are worse than death-row inmates—not because of their “crimes” but because of their religious beliefs.

We are denied many privileges according to BOP policy because we are Muslims. Visits must be through glass and phone calls and outgoing mail are routed through Washington D.C. The buildings are old and leaking so it’s cold in the winter, flying insects in the summer and air circulation is poor year round. Lead is seeping out of the walls and many inmates suffer chronic joint pain.

The government is trying to goad us to act violently so they can justify their claim that we are dangerous, but they have failed. According to the jail guards this Muslim unit is the most peaceful they have ever seen in any prison anywhere and they ask to be allowed to work here.

I agree that those guilty of terrorism should be prosecuted, but innocent people should not be targeted. Locking us down in this dirty, old, cold, leaking building and prohibiting us from hugging our children and restricting our calls to them will never bring peace to this country or make this nation safer.

 

To the American people:I have been singled out, isolated and discriminated against because of my race and religion. I am being held here in detention against my will for crimes that I never committed. I am not a terrorist and I should not be treated like one.The AUSA succeeded in getting a verdict against me from the jurors in December, 2006, with the help of the media glamorization of the “war on terror.” I have been convicted of guilt by association; of making the FBI angry and vengeful by refusing both to work for them abroad in an undercover capacity and to testify against members of the Sikh religion using their fabricated statements; and of being a Muslim and native of Pakistan.

Isn’t it time that all humans are equal? Isn’t it time that everyone is free to choose his faith? Are human rights protected by law? We hear this, but we would like to see it – especially in this country called the United States of America that claims itself across the world as a champion of human rights.

This article was edited for publication in the hardcopy edition of The IO. The full-length version is posted online at The IO website under the Nov., 2008 update. You can correspond with Awan by writing to:

Khalid Awan, #50959-054, Federal Correctional Inst., PO Box 33, Terre Haute, IN 47808

 

http://www.awankhalid.com/

 

Andrew

NY LAW , ,

Motorcycle Accidents

February 2nd, 2009
Evan Langsted asked:


Motorcycles are becoming an increasingly popular mode of transportation. Every three or four years our streets and highways in the United States see an increase of 1 million new registered motorcycles. The reasons for this are several; motorcycles are fun to ride, they save thousands of fuel dollars for commuters, and are generally more convenient to park, store, and maintain. Motorcycles have several advantages over other vehicles, especially in a city known for its traffic congestion and high population density.

Unfortunately, riding a motorcycle puts you at a much higher risk of serious injury if you are ever involved in an accident. The plain and obvious fact is you are not protected from injury as you are in an automobile. No matter how many safety precautions you take as a motorcyclist, and no matter how much you invest in protective wear, you are several times more likely to be injured, or killed in a motorcycle accident than in a car accident.

Here are some other statistics to consider:

Motorcyclists are 34 times more likely to die in a motorcycle accident than if in an automobile accident. Motorcycles make up a little over two percent of total registered vehicles, but account for 10 percent of total traffic fatalities. In fatal two-vehicle accidents involving a motorcycle and a passenger vehicle, 90 percent were driving the motorcycle, 8 percent were passengers on the motorcycle, and 2 percent were occupants of the passenger vehicle. Approximately 75 percent of accidents involving a motorcycle and a passenger vehicle list the motorcycle as the striking vehicle. Over 90 percent of accidents involving a motorcycle and a passenger vehicle occur on non-interstate roadways. 60 percent of these accidents occur on urban roadways. Nationwide, of every 100 non-helmeted motorcyclists killed in accidents, roughly 37 of those would have survived had they been wearing a helmet. 97 percent of motorcyclist fatalities are male.

Motorcycle accidents differ from automobile accidents in many specific ways regarding insurance, state laws, regulations, and other factors. If you have been involved in a motorcycle-related accident, it is important to seek counsel from an experienced motorcycle injury lawyer in order to receive maximum compensation.



Jeffrey

NY LAW , ,

List of All Uscis (formerly Ins) Offices Nationwide and Consulates

January 16th, 2009
Manu Geol asked:


US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is a part of the Department of Homeland Security, and performs some of the functions formerly carried out by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), which was part of the Department of Justice. USCIS was created on March 1, 2003 from what was formerly the Immigration Services Division (ISD) of the INS, which is now abolished.

USCIS does processing of immigrant visa petitions, naturalization petitions and asylum and refugee applications. It also issues employment authorization documents (EAD) and grants lawful permanent resident status (green card), and citizenship to foreigners. It was created by the government to process applications more efficiently and effectively. Besides, improvement efforts have included reducing the backlog of applications, as well as providing customer service through different channels.

Following is the list of 83 USCIS District Offices and Sub-offices nationwide.

Agana, GU; Albany, NY; Albuquerque, NM; Anchorage, AK; Atlanta, GA; Baltimore, MD; Boise, ID; Boston, MA; Buffalo, NY; Casper, WY; Charleston, SC; Charleston,WV; Charlotte Amalie Charlotte, NC; Cherry Hill, NJ; Chicago, IL; Christiansted, VI; Chula Vista, CA; Cincinnati, OH; Cleveland, OH; Columbus, OH; Dallas, TX; Denver, CO; Des Moines, IA; Detroit, MI; Dover, DE; El Paso, TX; Fort Smith, AR; Fresno, CA; Greer, SC; Harlington, TX; Hartford, CN Helena, MT Honolulu, HW Houston, TX; Indianapolis, IN Jacksonville, FL Kansas City, MO Las Vegas, NV Los Angeles, CA; Louisville, KY Manchester, NH Memphis, TN Miami, FL Milwaukee, WI

New Orleans, LO New York City, NY Newark, NJ Norfolk, VA Oklahoma City, OK; Omaha, NE; Orlando, FL Philadelphia, PA Phoenix, AZ Pittsburgh, PA; Portland, ME Portland, OR; Providence, RI Reno, NV Rochester, NY; Sacramento, CA Saint Albans, VT Saint Louis, MO Saint Paul, MN Salt Lake City, UT; San Antonio, TX San Bernardino, CA San Diego, CA San Francisco, CA San Jose, CA; San Juan, PR Santa Ana, CA Seattle, WA Spokane, WA Syracuse, NY; Tampa, FL Tucson, AZ Washington, DC West Palm Beach, FL; Witchita, KS and Yakima, WA.



Virginia

NY LAW , ,

Case Study: Murder—one Jurisdiction at a Time: the Case of Robert Ben Rhoades

January 11th, 2009
The American College of Forensic Examiners asked:


The case of Robert Ben Rhoades serves as an excellent example of the type and nature of case to which VICAP’s services would provide critical assistance and support. Rhoades is considered one of the most dangerous and notorious serial sex offenders and killers in the United States. Some investigators believe that he is responsible for at least 50, but possibly hundreds, of deaths. However, he has only been convicted of one homicide, for which he is serving a life sentence.

Rhoades was a professional long-haul truck driver, and his case dramatically demonstrates the sophistication of a criminal predator who can effectively defy law enforcement by taking advantage of fragmented law enforcement efforts, disconnected and detached data resources, and inconsistent investigative approaches.

On April 1, 1990, Trooper Mike Miller, an Arizona highway patrolman, observed a semi-tractor-trailer parked on the shoulder of I-10. As Miller approached the vehicle to offer assistance, he looked inside the 18-wheeler and observed a bound, nude, white female in the sleeper berth of the cab. A horse-type bit and bridle was in the mouth of the terrified victim, who was chained to the interior of the truck. Also in the sleeper berth was Robert Ben Rhoades, who, when surprised by the trooper’s advance, immediately exited the truck and tried to convince Miller that nothing was wrong. Rhoades stated that the events being discovered were consensual and a private matter.

While Miller tried to sort through the situation, he placed Rhoades under arrest, at which time he discovered Rhoades was in possession of a loaded .25 Caliber automatic pistol (Brandel, 1966). Rhoades was placed in the trooper’s vehicle and secured with a seat belt. By the time Miller had checked on the victim and returned to the squad car, Rhoades had managed to get the seat belt off and slip his handcuffed hands in front of him. Miller asked Rhoades if he had a handcuff key, to which Rhoades affirmatively replied. Miller took the key, re-cuffed Rhoades behind his back and through his belt, and stayed with him until backup officers arrived at the scene to assist.

After the terrified victim (later identified as Lisa Pennal) was released, she recounted her story of abduction and torture. She stated that she had accepted a ride with Rhoades at a coffee shop in Buckeye, Arizona. Although Pennal was difficult to interview and spoke in fractured sentences, the investigators learned of her transient lifestyle and current drug abuse. The investigator noted that though she was dressed in a skirt and shirt, on her feet she wore only slippers designed like a cartoon tiger.

The victim indicated that she had fallen asleep in the sleeper berth, only to awake as Rhoades was placing handcuffs on her wrists and ankles. She stated that Rhoades beat her with a whip, attached a chain around her neck, and attached spring-type clips to her nipples and vagina. It was unclear how long Rhoades had kept Lisa Pennal in this torture chamber, but the physical injuries on her body indicated that several events of whipping and torture occurred. During this ordeal, Rhoades told Pennal that he had been doing this to girls and women for 15 years.

Even though Rhoades was handcuffed and in custody, he remained calm. He made light of the mental capacity of the victim and tried to get the investigator to sympathize with him as he described her as the aggressor in the event, referring to her as a “lot lizard.” Alva Busch quotes Rhoades in the book Roadside Prey: “‘I can tell you, this girl is not playing with a full deck,’ laughed Rhoades, as if someone had told a joke . . ‘She ain’t wrapped too tight,’ chuckled Rhoades, ‘you don’t screw around with the women on the road. Not unless you want your dick to drop off, okay? . . . She wanted to go to bed. . . . I was dragging anchor. She was going back to bed.’ I said, ‘Go ahead.’ She started taking off her clothes, and I said, ‘What the $%^& and I let her’” (1996, pp. 58–62).

The victim, who was hysterical at times, showed evidence of sustained physical and sexual abuse, corroborating her story of captivation. Rhoades’ explanation began to fall apart as investigators discovered large amounts of bondage-type pornography and sexual assault materials in his truck. Rhoades’ account was not supported by the clues.

During the subsequent investigation, search warrants were executed on the cab of the semi-tractor truck and on Robert Ben Rhoades’ residence in Houston, Texas. The results of the searches revealed a briefcase containing whips, handcuffs, spring-type clips, a dildo, various items of women’s clothing, miscellaneous paperwork, and several photographs of a young white female in various poses, both nude and partially dressed.

There were Polaroid photographs of several women inside “open-roofed” vehicles, apparently taken from inside the trucker’s cab as the women passed him on the highway. These photographs were seized from Rhoades’ Houston apartment. There were also photographs of one particular victim (a teenage girl) in the sleeper berth of the trucker’s cab, in the outdoors, and in an abandoned barn-type structure. In this particular set of photographs, the victim was handcuffed, chained, and posing with a dildo and had the spring-type clips attached to her nipples.

The teenager in the photographs remained unidentified as far as the Robert Ben Rhoades case was concerned. Then, on September 29, 1990, the decomposed body of a young female was found in an abandoned barn near Greenville, Illinois. The cause of death was determined to be ligature strangulation. The victim was later identified as 14-year-old Regina Walters. Walters was reported as a runaway from Pasadena, Texas, nearly 8 months before her remains were discovered. At the time of the initial missing persons report, Walters had been in the company of an 18-year-old white male named Ricky Lee Jones. The two were reportedly hitchhiking to New Mexico. Ricky Lee Jones has not been located as of this writing.

Interestingly, the investigators working on the Rhoades case and the investigators working the Walters case in Texas and Illinois were each working independently of one another. Finally, through teletype and national databases, they started working together.

Tragically, Robert Ben Rhoades would remain a “single episode” until September 28, 1991, when he would be tied to the death of Regina Kay Walters. There were no photos of Ricky Lee Jones in Rhoades’ collection, but there was a journal entry in a small notebook found in Rhoades’ possession at the time of his arrest that states, “Ricky is a dead man” (Evidence, 1990). Police also recovered several items of clothing that belonged to Walters in the possession of Robert Ben Rhoades (1990).

Reflecting on the comment Rhoades had made that he had been “doing this for 15 years,” investigators looked more closely into his trucking records. They discovered that the murderous trucker had traveled extensively from the shores of the Pacific Ocean to the East Coast of New Jersey. He specifically traveled through Washington, Oregon, California, Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Virginia, Georgia, and Florida (Evidence, 1990).

Suddenly, the many missing persons, unidentified bodies, and unsolved homicide cases in each of those states took on new meaning. Law enforcement agencies began to share information about similar crimes and victims more generously than at any time before the incident. Since the Rhoades case broke, there have been many missing persons and unsolved homicide cases that have been attributed to Rhoades, but he has only been prosecuted for the death of Regina Walters.

This “single episode,” while not forgotten, joined the huge caseload of Detective Susan Trammell, receiving less investigative attention as leads cooled and time passed. During this same period of time, Rhoades continued to travel from one state to another. As the Rhoades saga progressed, information was discovered about another victim named Shana Holts, from January of 1990, who came into contact with Rhoades at a truck stop in San Bernardino, California.

Shana Holts escaped Rhoades’ torture and reported the terrifying incident, mirroring the events that Trooper Miller uncovered. Holts was so terrified of Rhoades that when she was faced with the prospect of identifying him after fleeing his vehicle, and then of having to testify against him, she declined to cooperate any further and the case was dismissed.

Other similar situations were discovered as time went on. Law enforcement agencies in many different parts of the United States had criminal abductions and possible homicide charges against Rhoades based on comparisons and travel routes. In each of those incidents, the individual agencies initially believed they were dealing with a single event, pertaining only to their jurisdiction. It was not until the final chapter of the Rhoades saga was written that each agency came to realize that its “single event” was the work of a sadistic serial rapist and murderer.

The Rhoades case has helped law enforcement agencies across the United States to see, in graphic detail, the value of cooperating, communicating, and coordinating their efforts in solving difficult criminal cases. If better information sharing and coordination had occurred, it might have dramatically reduced the number of victims who fell prey to Robert Ben Rhoades (Cooper & King, 2001).

This case is reviewed in more dramatic detail in the recently published book Predators: Who They Are and How to Stop Them (Cooper, King, & McHoes, 2007). Additionally, it is cited as a case methodology reference in the second edition of Analyzing Criminal Behavior II (Cooper & King, 2001). Another thorough review of the case is presented in the true crime novel Roadside Prey (Busch, 1996).

References

Cooper, G. M, King, M. R., & McHoes, T. (2007). Predators: Who they are and how to stop them. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.

Cooper, G. M. & King, M. R. (2001). Analyzing criminal behavior and victimology: Predators. Odgen, UT: IQ Design: Institute of Investigative Science.

Busch, A. (1996). Roadside prey. New York: Pinnacle Books.

The People of the State of Illinois v. Robert Ben Rhoades, No. 5-98-0821, (5th District Appellate Court of Illinois. July 13, 2001). n

THE FORENSIC EXAMINER Winter 2007 www.acfei.com

In the last issue, Greg Cooper wrote about the Violent Criminal Apprehension Program (VICAP), explaining its purpose and mission. In this issue, he presents a case study exemplifying how VICAP can help solve crimes.

missing image file

missing image file

s Mugshot of Robert Ben Rhoades

(800) 423-9737 Winter 2007 THE FORENSIC EXAMINER

missing image file

States in which Rhoades was a suspect in killings

Arizona: The only state in which Rhoades was convicted

The Rhoades case has

helped law enforcement

agencies across the

United States to see, in

graphic detail, the value of

cooperating, communicating,

and coordinating their

efforts in solving

difficult criminal cases.”

In March of 1991, the Illinois State Police received this letter from Regina Walters’ mother:

Dear Sir:

In September 1990, the police in Illinois found the remains of Regina Kay Walters. She disappeared February 3, 1990, from Pasadena, Texas. She was only fourteen years old at the time, and my only daughter. At this time the police have not yet brought to justice the person who has done this to my child. Even though we did not live in Illinois, this case should still be kept open. No child’s death should be given up. It could happen again.

At that time, the police in Illinois asked us to keep this out of the media. We have done that and more. Just because you haven’t heard from us doesn’t mean we don’t care. We were trying to give you time to find Regina’s killer. Please don’t give up. What if it was one of your children? You couldn’t rest, knowing there is someone out there who took someone you loved, and don’t ever think we didn’t love Regina, because she was very much loved. So please don’t quit looking for the killer of Regina Kay Walters.

Sincerely,

Carolyn S. Walters

(Busch, 1996, pp. 137–138)

About the Author

ISBN 978-1-59102-506-1

THE FORENSIC EXAMINER Winter 2007 www.acfei.com

Greg Cooper, MPA, FBI (retired), Chief of Police (retired), started his criminal profiling career in 1986 with the FBI, Seattle Division. Just a couple of years later, he was promoted to field coordinator for the Criminal Profiling Unit at the FBI Academy in Quantico, VA, and then in Los Angeles, CA. In 1990 he was promoted to profiler with the Quantico unit, where he taught several classes at the FBI’s prestigious National Academy and supervised VICAP. In 1995, Cooper became the chief of police in Provo. Currently, he enjoys instructing courses and serving as an expert witness.

(800) 423-9737 Winter 2007 THE FORENSIC EXAMINER – published by Robert L. O’Block



Jerry

NY LAW , ,

Option of Used Cars New York Enables you to Buy your Dream Machine

December 29th, 2008
Tim Johrer asked:


Owning your favorite car is like catching up your dreams. Obviously, you would celebrate on buying your favorite machine. But, some people may find it difficult to buy brand new cars. This does not mean that you are devoid of your favorite and the most lovable dream machine. It is understood that your joy would know no bounds on owning a beautiful and shinning car. If you are not able to afford a new one, then you can settle for used car. It may happen that the term used car may not give you a good feeling, but it is not that you will get a worn out car.

If you have got up your sleeves up to buy used car, then you are in need of a used car dealer. If you stay in New York, you can visit your nearest used car dealer to check out a variety of colors of you favorite car. Black, blue, silver, red, maroon and various metallic colors are usually available with the dealers. With so many colors at display, you can select as per your choice. In this way, you will get your favorite car along with your favorite color. This is like getting more than expected. Buying used car from a reliable dealer can be the best option available for you.

Money is a big constraint in buying your dream machine. Buying used cars is a cheaper option available for you. It is because you tend to get your dream machine in quite a less price than brand new cars. In fact, the price drops down to at least twenty to thirty percent. Apart from the market price of the used car, prices also depreciate on the basis of the car’s condition. Whatever the case may be, at least you are getting the car in lower rate. While, buying used car, just remember that everything that shines is not gold. You should not rest assured that used cars will not accompany defects.

It is always mandatory for every buyer to check the car completely, if they have some serious defects or not. Apart from this, another thing to be noticed in buying used cars is that you should cross check depreciated price so that you really get a best deal from used car dealer. If the dealer is charging higher amount than the genuine one or any defect crops up again after getting it amended, you can take the help of a lawyer to solve this matter. Under the Lemon Law, you can catch the dealer or manufacturer for this cleverness. Before taking this step, you should ensure that all the documents and papers of that used car are available with you.

Whether in New York or any other city, used cars are available everywhere for buyers. If you are caught up in your working schedule and willing to go for a used car, searching online is the best option. Looking for used cars on sites enables you to have hand-on useful information. This information can prove highly beneficial for you in buying you dream car. Moreover, you will be on safer side as all the necessary information will be at your disposal.



ARAM

NY LAW , ,

Miscommunication Between Medical Professionals Calls for a Medical Malpractice Lawyer to the Rescue

December 8th, 2008
Paul Justice asked:


Have you recently been to the doctor and received a diagnosis that did not seem right? Have you been to the hospital and were tossed around from doctor to doctor, test to test, to not come to a decisive manner? Have you received a prescription that seems to do absolutely nothing for you? If you have answered yes to any of these questions, you may have become victim to medical malpractice. Medical malpractice can take the shape of all forms ranging from minor inconsistencies to invasive surgery errors. Whatever the case may be, an act of medical malpractice can lead to astounding medical bills now and in the future. For this act of medical malpractice can cause complications that show up years after first inclination occurred.

For instances of medical malpractice can either be pure accidental or they can be contrived. Either way an occurrence of medical malpractice can cause severe harm and devastation to you and your family. It is up to you to come forward if you have been victim to medical malpractice. If you keep this problem in the dark for fear of embarrassment, doctors will not learn their lesson. It is up to the victims to shed light to this epidemic that is sweeping the nation. If you or a loved one has been caused harm due to an act of medical malpractice, contact a Medical malpractice lawyer as soon as possible.

There are some key items to think about if you feel you have become victim to medical malpractice. The first thing to consider is, did you keep the same doctor throughout your treatment plan, or did you receive medical attention from a multitude doctors? If you only saw one doctor, open the lines of communication. Talk to them about what is going on, for they are the sole medical professional that provided medical care on you. They should have all the information that you need to take your concerns to the next step. If you saw a multitude of doctors during your treatment plan, you may need to tap into those investigative skills you learned from TV shows.

For miscommunication between doctors is something that can cause harm to a patients treatment plan. Make sure to keep all medical documents so that you have proof to what doctor did what. From there you will be able to determine where one went wrong. In order to prove medical malpractice you must prove that the medical professional had a duty of care to you. Once that is established, your medical malpractice lawyer must not prove that your doctor failed to provide you with that duty of care.

In instances of medical malpractice, it is imperative to contact a medical malpractice lawyer. For they have the skill sets needed to prove that your medical professional acted negligent. Also, medical malpractice lawyers have the experience in dealing with large medical institutions as well as large insurance companies to gain the most accurate settlement necessary. A medical malpractice lawyer will stand up for you in a court of law and make sure that your rights are being protected.



Peter

NY LAW , ,